Logo
Explore the rheological properites of minerals at extreme conditions

Programs

F. Automation and real-time creep software
The physical machinery and analytical equipment for in-situ deformation at mantle pressures has developed rapidly under RGC phase I, the methods of data reduction, especially for the white beam experiments, have lagged behind. Much larger quantities of diffraction data must be taken during a dynamic experiment such as creep, and unless the methods are in place for processing these data as fast as they are generated, the operator of a creep experiment will be “flying blind.” Much as not knowing temperature until after an experiment concludes, the lack of real-time knowledge of pressure and rheology (i.e., stress and strain rate), hinders the operator’s ability to control the experiment and understand current behavior. One piece of valuable knowledge to the operator is recognizing when steady state is reached; another is knowing whether mean stress (pressure) is changing or is constant. Only gross measures of stresses (±several 0.1 GPa) are currently available real time, far too coarse to monitor behavior at the requisite10-MPa scale. We must manipulate a data stream from 10 rather than 4 detectors for the white radiation data and handle the image processing of the monochromatic data from the CCD detector. We must achieve near real-time conversion of diffraction spectra to measured stress, in order to operate in the conventional style of a dynamic experiment, wherein the operator observes variables (e.g., stress and strain) as a function of time, while monitoring key environmental conditions, and makes operational decisions on the basis of how the experiment is proceeding. The entire system— deformation apparatus, diffraction and imaging detectors, as well as beam defining optics—should be integrated in operation. All materials that are in the cell should be known to the data analysis program with the ability to recognize them in the diffraction pattern and calculate relative amounts of the different materials in the scattering volume. Peak fitting should be done with a Rietveld type philosophy of accounting for every bump that can come from the materials in question.